| RAID 6 |
RAID 5 |
| In complex arrays (12-24 drives),
RAID 6 applications would be a preferred choice due to
the fact that Serial ATA drives used in the arrays have
a lower duty cycle and may be more likely to fail in 24/7
or business-critical applications. |
In small arrays (4-12 drives),
RAID 5 applications can quickly repair a failed drive
and restore lost data-without taking down the array.
It's perhaps the most cost-effective, fault-tolerant
data protection solution currently available for small
storage devices. |
| Pro |
Pro |
- Designed for tolerating two simultaneous
HDD failures by storing two sets of distributed parities.
|
- Simplified hardware implementation
- A matured industry standard
|
| Con |
Con |
- For RAID 6, one needs a more complex system with
a method for encoding, as well as XOR calculations.
For that, one really needs hardware acceleration,
otherwise the performance suffers.
- Uses 2 drives for parity
|
- The risk of simultaneous drive failures grows in
proportion to the drive array and can increase if
customers purchase all of the disks in an enclosure
at one time.
- If the system finds a faulty sector on another
drive during this degraded state (one drive down,
spare drive being rebuilt), the RAID 5 system would
be unable to restore the data onto the spare drive,
resulting in data loss.
|
| Recommended Configuration |
Recommended Configuration |
- Disk array consists of 12 disks or more
|
- Disk array consists of 10 disks or less
|
| Recommended Solutions |
Recommended Solutions |
- Desktop: EnhanceRAID T8
- Rackmount: EnhanceRAID R14; UltraStor RS16
|
- Desktop: EnhanceRAID T4HCR, T5,T8
- Rackmount: EnhanceRAID R4,R6,R8; UltraStor RS8 or RS2080
|